WHAT WE DO

Patent strategy, engineered for deep tech

We combine experienced patent judgment, genuine technical fluency, and disciplined AI tools to help deep-tech companies build IP portfolios that stand up when it matters most.

CORE SERVICES

Structured IP strategy, engineered results

Invention Analysis & Filing Strategy

We assess new inventions in technical and portfolio context, helping clients prioritize filings, identify the strongest claim opportunities, and align patent activity with product and business strategy. Our process starts with a structured technical interview — not a form — and ends with a filing recommendation grounded in both legal and competitive analysis.

This service is particularly valuable for companies with multiple inventions in development and limited budget for prosecution, where prioritization and sequencing decisions have significant long-term consequences.

Portfolio-Aware Patent Drafting

We draft and prosecute patents with the broader portfolio in view — strengthening claim coverage, reducing duplication, and supporting long-term strategic flexibility. Every specification is written to support continuation and divisional filing opportunities, not just the immediate application.

Our drafting process integrates prior art research, competitor portfolio analysis, and claim mapping to ensure that each filing adds genuine defensive and offensive value to the overall portfolio architecture.

Investor-Ready IP Foundations

We help companies build patent portfolios that stand up in investor diligence, support financing discussions, and reinforce the value of core technical platforms. This includes IP landscape analysis, portfolio gap assessment, and developing the claim framework needed to establish a defensible position before a fundraising event.

For companies approaching Series A or B, we often conduct a structured IP readiness review — identifying strengths, weaknesses, and the specific filings needed to present a credible IP story to technical diligence teams.

Predictable Legal Cost Models

Our flat-fee model gives companies clearer budgeting, more predictable legal spend, and a practical framework for managing patent costs as they scale. We quote fixed fees for most patent matters — application drafting, response to office actions, appeals — so there are no surprises at the end of the month.

We believe that cost transparency is a strategic advantage. When clients know exactly what a filing will cost, they can make better decisions about portfolio development without the uncertainty that hourly billing introduces.

Deep-Tech Patent Strategy

We advise on patent strategy across AI, life sciences, computational platforms, and other complex technologies where technical depth and strategic judgment matter. This includes sector-specific landscape analysis, white space identification, and developing multi-year prosecution roadmaps aligned with product development timelines.

Our team includes advisors with direct research experience in molecular biology, machine learning, and computational mathematics — giving us the scientific fluency to engage with your technology at the level it deserves.

AI-Accelerated Patent Execution

We use AI to support research, drafting, and analysis while keeping legal strategy, review, and professional judgment under direct attorney supervision. This allows us to deliver more thorough prior art analysis, more structured claim drafts, and more consistent portfolio tracking — without compromising the quality standards that complex technology patents demand.

AI at TechNomos is a tool under attorney control — every AI-assisted output is reviewed, refined, and approved by a qualified legal professional before it becomes part of any client deliverable.

PRICING

Transparent, predictable fees.

We use flat-fee pricing for most patent matters, providing greater cost transparency and predictability for technology companies navigating patent strategy for the first time or scaling an existing portfolio.

Foundation

Startup & Early Stage

For companies with 1–5 inventors and an initial technology to protect. Fixed fees, clear scope, no surprises.

Invention disclosure review and technical assessment
Provisional or non-provisional application drafting
Prior art search and claim mapping
Office action responses (fixed per response)
Portfolio planning consultation

Portfolio

Growth & Scale

For companies building out a portfolio across multiple technology areas or preparing for a financing event.

Everything in Foundation
IP landscape and competitive analysis
Portfolio architecture and claim strategy
Investor diligence preparation and IP narrative
Continuation and divisional strategy
Monthly portfolio review and prosecution tracking

Every engagement is scoped individually. Contact us for a detailed proposal tailored to your technology and stage.

Get a proposal

Patent strategy, engineered for deep tech

What technology sectors do you focus on?

We work across AI and machine learning, biotechnology and life sciences, medical devices, computational platforms, semiconductor technology, and other complex engineering domains where technical depth is essential to strong patent strategy.
Do you handle international patent filings?

Yes. We advise on PCT strategy and international filing decisions, and coordinate with trusted foreign counsel in key jurisdictions including Europe, China, Japan, and South Korea. International filing strategy is developed in the context of your overall portfolio and commercial priorities.
How quickly can you respond to an office action?

We typically aim to deliver a response draft within 2–3 weeks of receipt, depending on complexity. For inter partes review or other contested proceedings, timelines are developed case by case. We will always flag deadlines in advance and work with you on timing.
What is your engagement model?

Most clients engage us on a matter-by-matter basis with fixed fees per filing or response. For portfolio clients, we offer monthly retainer arrangements that include prosecution management, portfolio review, and strategic advisory. Both models provide predictable costs and clear scope.